<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
>

<channel>
	<title>E-learning and Digital Cultures 2011 sbayne@ed Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/wp-content/recent-global-author-comments-feed.php?author=5" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk</link>
	<description>part of the MSc in E-learning at the University of Edinburgh</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
    			<item>
				<title>Comments on: Posthuman Pedagogy</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/11/27/posthuman-pedagogy/#comment-48</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/11/27/posthuman-pedagogy/#comment-48</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[This is great stuff Steph, and I really like the way you are playing with the relationship between body, implant and device here - really clever. I think you would like Annemarie Mol's work on technology and medicine and her actor-network theory influenced ways of viewing them. If you had time to get hold of 'The body multiple: ontology in medical practice' (2002) I think you would get something from it.

Great pedagogy anyway - thanks!]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: AI, Cyborgs and Robots</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/11/16/ai-cyborgs-and-robots/#comment-239</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/11/16/ai-cyborgs-and-robots/#comment-239</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[But isn't the argument that information isn't 'carried' so much as generated in the process of a body's interaction with an environment? So if I touch a cut lemon with a cut on my finger the information I then 'carry' about the lemon (pain) is very different from the information someone else 'carries' who has touched it with intact skin. Maybe not a great example, but doesn't that view work against the idea of information 'storage' and 'transfer' between bodies/entities?]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: AI, Cyborgs and Robots</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/11/16/ai-cyborgs-and-robots/#comment-183</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/11/16/ai-cyborgs-and-robots/#comment-183</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Nice post Austin - I like the idea that focusing discussion on artificial agents helps us work around assumptions of species superiority. I'm not so sure about the notion of the human as soft machine though, as that seems to buy into some of the less critical posthumanist or transhumanist assumptions that information/code is something which it is possible to isolate from its material base, its body (Katherine Hayles' argument). 

Loved the octopus article. I like work which doesn't assume species superiority but which at the same time doesn't resort to cheesy anthropomorphism (cf the Frozen Planet). That later just seems to me another form of anthropocentrism.

Anyway, lots of thoughts from a short post - thanks!]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Virtual Ethnography</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/virtual-ethnography/#comment-103</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/virtual-ethnography/#comment-103</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Ania - a terrific piece of work as everyone says. Just one thing to add - in thinking about 'objectivity' as a researcher (and quite a few people are grappling with this) it might be useful to read Elliot Eisner's paper on 'Objectivity in Educational Research' (http://www.jstor.org/stable/1180090) which I think does a really nice job of questioning whether objectivity is possible, or even necessarily desirable.

Thanks again for a great ethnography : )]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Micro-ethnography: TheGlobalWe</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/11/10/micro-ethnography-theglobalwe/#comment-35</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/11/10/micro-ethnography-theglobalwe/#comment-35</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Steph, I enjoyed the way you used prezi to pull together fragments - a kind of bricolage - around your ethnographic themes - it was really nicely done. It's prompted a really interesting set of comments too, particularly around the ethical issues you raise. I'd agree with Jeremy that whether we think in terms of the internet as 'space' or 'text' does inflect how we approach questions of ethics. There's a nice paper by Bassett and O'Riordan in which they align the 'space' metaphor with the 'human subjects' research model, moving on to suggest we need to move beyond that and see internet spaces as partly textual, and partly a 'space' in which 'humans' interact - some good ties in with this week's theme there too. It's at: http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_bas_full.html if you fancy a read.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Mini ethnography - the virtual choir</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/11/07/mini-ethnography-the-virtual-choir/#comment-29</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/11/07/mini-ethnography-the-virtual-choir/#comment-29</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[I thought this was great Geraldine - I liked the fragmented form of the timeline, and the way it let you aggregate a lot of fragments around your theme. I share your frustration on the brevity of postings though - I wanted to read more of your analysis and interpretation, especially since your blog posting (and Jenny's response) was so interesting. The notion of 'imagined community' for this kind of event is a lovely one and I thought the link with 'mass' sporting events was really nicely done. It would be very tempting to do a much bigger study of the VC!]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: </title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/week-by-week/block-2-virtual-communities/all-the-ethnographies-in-one-place/#comment-764</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 09:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/week-by-week/block-2-virtual-communities/all-the-ethnographies-in-one-place/#comment-764</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Thanks both - I've amended the link now.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Mumsnet ethnography</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/carolc/2011/10/29/mumsnet-ethnography/#comment-39</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/carolc/2011/10/29/mumsnet-ethnography/#comment-39</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[This is great Carol - I'd never been into mumsnet before and I found this a really nice critical introduction.

There were a few things I wanted to know more about - you mentioned at one point that the cultural and political capital of the site might bias the ethnographer, and I wondered in what sense you meant this - do you mean that its apparent politics are likely to alienate/prompt allegiance in particular ways? How would you see this as affecting a more sustained ethnography of the site?

I guess a related issue is the one you raise on self reflexivity and the need to position ourselves as researchers - on this point it wasn't clear to me what your own position was, as a mumsnet user or refuser! I'd have liked to have known more.

I loved your reading of the logo btw - militarised images of babies are always likely to provoke and that seemed to sum up something of the site's general ethos!]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: GA-MMA Virtual Ethnography</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/10/31/ga-mma-virtual-ethnography/#comment-71</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 09:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/10/31/ga-mma-virtual-ethnography/#comment-71</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed delving into the world of GA-MMA - thanks Austin (I confess I didn't even know who Gerry Anderson was before reading this!). I thought the mix of facts, figures and anecdote made for a really enjoyable read - I wanted to know more by the end. For example, extracting the figures for public postings from Yahoo was neat, but then I wondered what those figures revealed, if anything, about patterns of interest in the group - what was going on in August 2004 for example? And why was 2005 so dead?

I can see you had good ethical reasons for not making the private content public, but I'd have loved to have seen a bit of qualitative data on this - some examples of exchanges and a sense of how this community 'writes' itself into existence!

I also wasn't sure how, by the end of this, you'd answer your question about group responses to newbie and expert questions - or what that might tell us about how the group builds boundaries between outsiders and insiders?

Anyway, I have many more questions stimulated by this, which is a good thing - it's a rich glimpse into a strange new world for me!]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: AI - Avatar Indentity - Machinima</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/10/17/ai-avatar-indentity-machinima/#comment-57</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/10/17/ai-avatar-indentity-machinima/#comment-57</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Lovely bit of machinima Austin. The soundtrack is perfect and you capture something very uneasy in the way your AI avatar seems lost in a field of clones. It had something of the wicker man in it for me : )]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Lo and behold ...</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/10/14/lo-and-behold/#comment-38</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/10/14/lo-and-behold/#comment-38</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[I loved this Ania - I think I felt the opposite of Neil and Geraldine in that I found the eye chillingly detached and seemingly unoffended by the carnage and misery. Like Austin I enjoyed the surveillance reference and the sense of the omnipresent watcher. You could've chosen a machinic rather than a human eye, but I like the way its humanity makes an obvious link between the technological and the social - and the fact that it's an 'authorial' eye gives yet another layer of complexity! (btw I loved the composite image too, which I found almost equally eerie.)]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Uncanny pedagogy: Fear or fascination in digital learning environments</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/10/13/uncanny-pedagogy-fear-or-fascination-in-digital-learning-environments/#comment-16</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/10/13/uncanny-pedagogy-fear-or-fascination-in-digital-learning-environments/#comment-16</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Your point on plagiarism has got me thinking! If a wordle counts as image rather than text, how do we think about 'citation' in the context of the visualisation of textual material? Fascinating stuff on so many levels here...]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Visual Artefact 1.0</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/danielg/2011/10/11/visual-artefact-1-0/#comment-39</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/danielg/2011/10/11/visual-artefact-1-0/#comment-39</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Another great image. I like the connected brains - links for me to the notion of the cognisphere (Hayles) which we look at later in the course. There's an emphasis here on the implant and the prosthesis - very physical and 'violent' machinic interventions in the body, which are somehow offest by that more conceptual, central image of the connected brains. Loads to think about - thanks Daniel.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Visual artefact</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/carolc/2011/10/12/visual-artefact/#comment-24</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/carolc/2011/10/12/visual-artefact/#comment-24</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[This is great Carol! That baby's a doll, right? It looked to me like a pre-natal training situation...? Love the ambiguity though and like Austin says, the crying is disturbing whether or not the baby is really 'human'.

I wanted to link to the Daily Mail article (never thought I'd find myself saying that!) but couldn't find it. Anyway - I get the point - this is a really clever mix of all that is disturbing about the posthuman, the machinic, technological and social as it impacts on our ways of thinking about procreation, mortality and the 'human' - terrific.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Uncanny pedagogy: Fear or fascination in digital learning environments</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/10/13/uncanny-pedagogy-fear-or-fascination-in-digital-learning-environments/#comment-8</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/10/13/uncanny-pedagogy-fear-or-fascination-in-digital-learning-environments/#comment-8</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[This is a beautiful image Geraldine - I love the way you've layered your 'ghosts' and balanced an equal sense of the frantic and the tranquil here, partly through the combination of the muted colour palatte you've used and the dynamism of the light. I agree with Grace that the mix of the familiar and unfamiliar is a little uncanny - like Austin (see his comment in flickr), I see the light as indicating activity around a complex mix of analogue and digital spaces. I wonder where the wordcloud was generated from - your blog maybe? Lovely piece of work!]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Week 4 Artifact: Worlds Divided</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/10/14/week-4-artifact-worlds-divided/#comment-7</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/10/14/week-4-artifact-worlds-divided/#comment-7</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Grace Elliott says: [copied Grace's comment over from the 'visual artefact' page] 

Hi Steph,

I like your visual artefact, from the virtual world of your opening image to the real world. Thought the song added to the effect. You divided up your theme very well, there was a good balance of images showing both positive and negative aspects. Being an expat communication is important to me. And the image of the crime being videoed for entertainment is in stark contrast to my use of the media. Made me feel quite sad.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Week 4 Artifact: Worlds Divided</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/10/14/week-4-artifact-worlds-divided/#comment-6</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 08:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/10/14/week-4-artifact-worlds-divided/#comment-6</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Steph, I really enjoyed your video - you have some really moving images in here, and the way you've used the soundtrack makes for a very poignant piece of work. I particularly liked the way you emphasised the militaristic dimensions of digital cultural dystopia - that made some real connections for me with the work of Donna Haraway and how she presents us with the figure of the cyborg as something that - though it has its roots in a military 'imaginary' - can take us away from the dystopian toward something more affirming, more joyous. Anyway thanks for this - great video.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: AI - Avatar Identity - Digital Artifact</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/10/10/ai-avatar-identity-a-visual-exploration/#comment-42</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 07:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/10/10/ai-avatar-identity-a-visual-exploration/#comment-42</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Hi Austin, I love what you're doing here with the multiple avatar 'identities' and the uncanny landscape - not to mention the gender play... (I particularly like the Avatar avatars!).

I've tried a couple of times to get in to open vue and look at the artefact there but haven't managed it. I'm trying to use my current SL browser, but can't work out where I should be pointing my avatar once I'm in?]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Why the dichotomy?</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/10/03/why-the-dichotomy/#comment-4</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/geraldinej/2011/10/03/why-the-dichotomy/#comment-4</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Interesting post Geraldine. It made me think of Neil Badmington's* point about the rise of Hollywood sci-fi in the 50s/60s and how that aligned with the theoretical challenge to the 'supremacy' of the human ('Man') in continental philosophy. Badmington makes the point that classic sci fi (The Blob, Return of the Body Snatchers, War of the Worlds etc) always made humanity victorious over the 'alien' other in an unconscious response to the sense that existing humanistic models for understanding our place in the world were under threat. So where theory was championing the 'death of Man' Hollywood was defending 'him' from attack - an oppositional landscape that is maybe shifting now as theory begins to re-accept forms of humanism and sci-fi begins to  present images of 'Man' as problematic (Avatar, and so on). Thanks anyway - I really like your discussion of 'cultural lag' here.

*Badmington, N. (2000). Posthumanism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Recollections of the first few years of the net</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/09/28/recollections-of-the-early-decades-of-the-internet/#comment-24</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/09/28/recollections-of-the-early-decades-of-the-internet/#comment-24</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[This is a fantastically direct and personal 'material story' to go alongside Bell's. You need to write a memoir - the fact that in the early days you were the first person to log on to the 'internet' in the morning is mind-boggling! Thanks for this Austin.]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: The Monster is Within</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/10/03/the-monster-is-within/#comment-23</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/10/03/the-monster-is-within/#comment-23</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Ania - I like the image you link to here - I wonder if you've seen Patricia Piccinnini's work and the way she plays with the idea of bio-technological intervention in the human body? More about her work here:
http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/
and some of her most striking work here:
http://www.patriciapiccinini.net/wearefamily/index.php?sec=yf]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Moveo ergo sum</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/09/25/moveo-ergo-sum/#comment-11</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/09/25/moveo-ergo-sum/#comment-11</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[I quite like Margaret Shilrick on this point about where the question of 'liquidity' in posthumanism leaves us, in termsof politics. She says:

The modernist focus on a humanist politics of norms and identity gives way to a politics of hybrids and transformation. And the point here is that although final meaning, full presence and fixed substance are all deferred, the promise is not one of unproductive, limitless fragmentation, but rather of dynamic new incorporations…. The postmodern challenge to humanism is innovative and creative rather than destructive.
Shildrick, Margaret (1996) Posthumanism and the monstrous body. Body and Society 2 (1): 1-15


There's lots of theoretical writing out there which counters the dystopian thinking we see so much of in the popular culture...]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Life Wall Pro - and Refinements - and the Baby Pictures</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/09/22/life-wall-pro-and-refinements-and-the-baby-pictures/#comment-9</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/austint/2011/09/22/life-wall-pro-and-refinements-and-the-baby-pictures/#comment-9</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Your wall got me thinking about the internet and memory, and whether memory is the retrieval of knowledge (of the past) already 'there', or more of a construction of the past in the act of remembering... Anyway I found a paper which puts Berners-Lee alongside Plato on memory and the question of the internet, in an interesting way:

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.125.9466&rep=rep1&type=pdf]]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Testing the waters</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/09/12/test/#comment-9</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/annar/2011/09/12/test/#comment-9</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Another nice post Ania - I do like the way you are interrogating 'culture' and 'digital' here. I wonder what you made of the Hand reading on this? - in particular perhaps his point that in its contemporary (digital) modes, culture is 'ubiquitous' - it's not 'out there' any more but (quoting Lash and Lury) 'seeps out of the superstructure and comes to infiltrate, and then take over, the infrastructure itself.']]></description>
			</item>
						<item>
				<title>Comments on: Hello world!</title>
				<link>http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/09/16/hello-world/#comment-2</link>

                <dc:creator>Siân Bayne</dc:creator>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
                
                <guid isPermaLink="false">http://edc11.education.ed.ac.uk/stephaniec/2011/09/16/hello-world/#comment-2</guid>
                <description><![CDATA[Hi Steph - how are things going? Drop me an email if you want to talk about getting the lifestream set up and so on. See you at the chat session next week?]]></description>
			</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
