Week 5 Lifestream Summary

Virtual communities is the theme of this block and our task is to build an ethnography,  something I haven’t attempted before.  In order to get an understanding I read and re-read the recommended readings. If I understand Hine (2000) correctly, an ethnography is an anthropological approach to studying cultures and should ‘share a a fundamental commitment to developing a deep understanding through participation and observation’.  I don’t think this ethnography will offer ‘the promise of getting closer to understandingthe ways in which people interpret the world and oranise their lives.’ (Hine 42) At best it will offer a ‘snapshot’ of a particular moment in time with a particular group of people.

I spent a good deal of time trying to find a suitable ‘community’. For Bell (2001) “…community arises from shared interests’. Flickr has numerous groups that share a common interest so I tried looking there. Unfortunately, this site is blocked.  Such group’s wouldn’t qualify as a community by Sardar’s interpretation, quoted in Hine;  ‘Belonging and posting to a Usenet group, or logging on to a bulletin board community, confirms no more an identity than belonging to a stamp collecting club…’  So how will I be able to recognise which is a ‘group’ and which a ‘community’?  Kozinets (2010) states that ‘the ways in which group norms develop and the importance of group identity are very similar in online and off-line groups.’ Hmm, so it’s not going to be so easy then.  After searching through various groups I settled on Food.com and posted my idea to the Holyrood Park discussion forum. It wasn’t that interesting to me but I felt my choice was limited.

When Jen said that this task wasn’t being assessed and should be fun it made a huge difference to my approach.  I have the FemaleScienceProfessor as an RSS feed to my lifestream.  I enjoy reading her blogs and the comments made by other science bloggers.  I now plan to do my ethnography on Science Bloggers.  I find this group more interesting and will it will be fun finding out whether or not they can be classed as a ‘community’.  To do this I shall follow the form suggested by Hammersley and Atkinson’s (quoted in Hine 41) by “ …participating, overtly or covertly in people’s daily lives for an extended period of time, watching what happens, listening to what is said “.

I had hoped to store images in my Flickr account but that still isn’t working. I don’t think it has anything to do with censorship because it linked with my lifestream at the beginning. I have a Picasa account but haven’t tried it out yet.

Bookmarking is also proving problematic.  Again, at the beginning my link with Delicious was working. As I couldn’t fix the problem I resurrected my Diigo account but  it doesn’t appear to be working either.

I know that my YouTube link is working.  After looking at the Rheingold video and checking out the WELL site, I had a search and found another Rheingold video that I added to my favourites. That has appeared in my lifestream.

I notice that my colleagues are busy tweeting and I haven’t contributed as much as I’d like.  Either Twitter is extremely popular or my Internet can’t handle the traffic, but I receive this sign quite often.

 

About Grace Elliott

Working at present as an Education Advisor for Abu Dhabi Education Council.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Week 5 Lifestream Summary

  1. Jeremy Keith Knox says:

    Getting a ‘snapshot’ of a community is a useful analogy Grace, and I think it’s a great way to start thinking about research methods. I think small studies are a great way to ‘scope out’ a community (I’m doing on at the moment!), and also to think about the ways in which established social science methods might relate to the ‘virtuality’ of the online.

    I think answering the question ‘is this group a community?’ is really interesting, and it gets to the core of what I think ‘virtuality’ brings to social science research. Rather than starting with the idea that you can actually come to understand what is going on in a given social group, I think digital communication forces us to challenge the assumptions of what a ‘community’ is…and that’s surely a good thing!

    Also, as Jen mentioned in a comment earlier, the Twitter ‘fail whale’ page spawned its own ‘community’, discussed in an ethnography last year: http://edc.education.ed.ac.uk/alisonj/2010/11/04/fail-whale-community-ethnography/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>